Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/stop/www/www/wp-includes/cache.php on line 33
Would Iran’s Mullahs Use the Bomb? » StopAhmadinejad.com

Would Iran’s Mullahs Use the Bomb?

January 22, 2007 by Alexander

Would Iran's Mullahs Use the Bomb? - StopAhmadinejad.com

There is so much smoke around the Iranian Mullahs’ bomb that makes Tehran’s smog feel like a fresh ocean breeze, by comparison. Here is a partial list of views about the Mullahs, their capabilities and intentions about the bomb affair. The Mullahs:

  • Will never dare to use the bomb, even if they had it. To do so would be suicidal.
  • Are years away from anything resembling a credible bomb, in any quantities.
  • They lack the technological skills needed to make a workable bomb.
  • Don’t have the means of hitting Israel with the bomb, their professed favorite target.
  • Want the bomb for defensive purposes only.
  • Would never hand the bomb over to proxy terrorists.
  • Are using this whole bomb thing as a ploy to rally the populace and survive.
  • Are visionary patriots planning for a future when the oil dries up.
  • Are environmentalists aiming to curb global warming caused by the use of fossil fuel.
  • Are striving to join the nuclear club for its prestige.

And on, and on, and on, goes the litany. I believe, based on facts rather than wishful thinking, that every one of the above assertions, as well as all other similar dismissive arguments are both false and fraught with danger, because all the above arguments are confounded by various amounts of denial.

Psychological denial is a common quirk of the human mind. People use denial to distort, even refute reality, when accepting it is too threatening to them.

Alcoholics are habitual users of denial, a major tranquilizer of the mind. The alcoholic will adamantly deny having any problem with alcohol and continues to drink, even in the face of irrefutable contrary evidence. Denial is resorted to by both individuals and groups, and can be just as deadly for both.

Perhaps the most compelling dismissive argument is that the Mullahs would never dare to use the bomb, since it would be suicidal to do so. This argument is just as flawed as the rest. The “mutual deterrence” argument may work in state-to-state confrontations. It apparently has worked in the past and the hope is that it will work in the future. However, the mutual deterrence argument fails when a non-state entity is the adversary. The Mullahs don’t have to lob a bomb at Israel or at anyone else to inflict huge harm. They can pursue their cause of death and destruction by simply providing their killers with dirty bombs in a suitcase. Given the Mullahs’ fanaticism and Machiavellian nature, they would come up with a myriad of clever schemes to achieve their objectives.

Consider dirty bombs. They are easy to make, are portable, can kill as well as make a city uninhabitable, without leaving a “finger print.” The Mullahs can go to work then turn “innocently” to the international community for help them- to find a group of rogue radicals, so they claim, who had penetrated their facilities and have made off with a loot of radioactive stuff.

It is not as if events like this have never happened in the past. Deadly stolen radioactive materials have found their way to the black market on a number of occasions. The world would respond in panic, yet with its usual arthritic sluggishness searching for the miscreants. Given how clumsy and disorganized the world’s intelligence community is, the prospect of acting expeditiously, much less apprehending the “thieves” is not very encouraging. This is particularly the case when the Mullahs themselves would have a short leash on the “thieves,” to hide them and deploy them only with the greatest of care.

Iran’s ruling Mullahs are clustered around major factions such as the conservatives, the moderates, and the so-called reformists. Yet, the differences among these factions are tactical rather than strategic. One and all share the same overarching goal of defeating the “Crusader-Zionists” by any and all methods possible; bringing about the “end of the world” Armageddon; and, thereby creating the requisite conditions for the appearance of the Hidden Imam, the Mahdi, to assume his rule of the world.

Therefore, it is Cart Risqué (foolish risk-taking a la Jimmy Carter’s throwing the nation’s lot with the Mullahs during the 1979 Iranian Revolution) to overlook the fact that it is Islam, irrespective of any and all considerations, that poses a deadly threat to the world. Choosing one faction over another is no choice at all.

What is the likelihood that the ruling Mullahs will actually use the bomb? If they remain in power long enough to have it, they are very likely to use it, in one form or another. At the very least, they use the bomb for blackmail and intimidation in the region. Not even the all-out nuclear exchange can be ruled out.

Islam is a religion centered on death with the faithful eyes fixed on the afterlife and its promised eternal pleasures. If the faithful kills, he goes to Allah’s paradise; if he gets killed, he goes to Allah’s paradise.

The Mullahs’ claim that they are pursuing the nuclear program to meet the country’s energy need could only fool the most gullible-denial type. Why is it that the Mullahs invest nothing at all in stopping the leak of more than six percent of the precious oil they pump out? For every 100 barrels, six barrels of Iran’s irreplaceable national treasure dissipates at the wellhead. Yet, they spend billions of dollars to harness nuclear energy. Just as troubling is the fact that Iran sits on one of the world’s most dangerous earthquake fault lines. Building nuclear plants on sites such as the one in Bushehr is absolute insanity.

Speaking of insanity, Ahmadinejad, the Monkey, comes to mind. He is dismissed as being a zany fanatic who shouldn’t be taken seriously for his bomb-rattling threats. But this type of dismissiveness can prove deadly. Recall that even a multi-billionaire former president of Iran Rafsanjani, a man seen by many as moderate and a shrewd live-let-live type, has publicly announced that a single bomb would finish off Israel while the Muslims would suffer a setback from which it can easily recover.

The Mullahs are proven vicious mass killers. They summarily executed tens of thousands of Iranian dissidents. They had no qualms at sending thousands of children to clear the minefields ahead of their tanks during the 80-89 war with Iraq; and, they have thousands of “martyrs” brainwashed and prepared to serve as bomb mules to be dispatched to any place in the world.

Sadly, once again it is the peak of “Me First” time with American politicians. Like sharks, they are circling the “bleeding” lame President, busily snipping at him and hoping to take his place. In the meantime the real enemy, Islamofascism is forging ahead toward its goal of dominating the world.

I have been warning that it is a deadly miscalculation to engage in infighting, and sit and wait this emerging catastrophe out. It is little more than an exercise in denial to believe that nothing bad will happen, and that the corrupt inept Mullahs will likely shoot themselves in the foot instead of wreaking havoc on the world. I also keep pleading that we should forthwith help the Iranian democratic oppositions send the death-bearer Mullahs back to their mosques. It is the free world’s best and urgent option.

What sane person would want to take a chance to wait and see if the mad Mullahs, once they have the bomb, would use it or not.

 - Amil Imani
Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the USA. He maintains a website, http://www.AmilImani.com

  Email this | Digg this | Del.icio.us  

Comments

  1. Posted by Sasha Anderson on January 22, 2007

    I’m not sure the Mullah’s would use the bomb. We must remember that Iranian ambitions to be a nuclear power did not start with Ahmadenijad. They go all the way back before the Iranian revolution to the days of the Shah of Iran. Obviously, today a “middle” power of the size of Iran will enhance its geopolitical strength if it’s a member of the nuclear club. Iran has its national interests, as all other states do, and it clearly wishes to play a central role in its region. However, if they get the bomb, there will be at least ten countries who will then work fast to do the same (Kissinger supports this claim as well). Some obvious candidates: Japan, S. Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Egypt, Iraq (yes!), South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, and many European countries. There could be close to 25 nuclear powers! The chances a weapon can get into the wrong hands increases exponentially.

  2. Posted by david snyder on February 2, 2007

    I could not agree more with your article.It is absolute insanity to allow Iran to develop any type of nuclear warfare capability for exactly the reasons you state.The argument that it would be insane for them to use a nuclear device does not hold up for people who welcome the coming of the next world.Proof of this is the unlimited supply of suicide bombers.If you accept their assumptions about the hereafter,their actions are perfectly rational.If the reign of the Mullahs is ever threatened and they have the bomb it will be used by them.

  3. Posted by david snyder on February 2, 2007

    I could not agree more with your article.It is absolute insanity to allow Iran to develop any type of nuclear warfare capability for exactly the reasons you state.The argument that it would be insane for them to use a nuclear device does not hold up for people who welcome the coming of the next world.Proof of this is the unlimited supply of suicide bombers.If you accept their assumptions about the hereafter,their actions are perfectly rational.If the reign of the Mullahs is ever threatened and they have the bomb it will be used by them.

  4. Posted by Nisse Humanist on January 2, 2009

    The Quran stats that a muslim shall lie if’t gain him.

    Ahmadinejad is lying, no doubt about it.

  5. Posted by Jew With A View on June 15, 2009

    Excellent article - and an equally excellent site. With much of Europe lambasting Israel for its’ concern over the spectre of a nuclear Iran, it’s a relief to have found this site!

  6. Posted by MUSLIMPOXBYEBYE on December 21, 2009

    if israel is wiped out what do you think muslims will do next. they’ll start killing each other and that beautifull chain of blood will never stop.
    if we think there will be peace after israel we must be still sleeping.
    muslim dogma is for power grabbing at all levels and blood on muslim hands is considered a good sign. be it brother’s or mother’s or sister’s or father’s. it’s all about honor which translates into money. the less the relatives the more the money the murderer has.so the fighting and the bloodshed will never stop. to be muslim today is to recognise one’s self as A cursed human being… pure scum …very sad…very bad. IT’S BEEN decided it’s better dead as a muslim than as a living muslim because muslims do not contribute anything to this planet except strife and hate which the rest of the HARDWORKING planet RIGHTFULLY resents. all muslims should realise the futility of living under the islamic cult and do the needful for this planet and commit mass suicide and meet and greet each other in heaven and admire each other’s virgins there.

  7. Posted by MUSLIMPOXBYEBYE on December 21, 2009

    THE MOVIE “PLANET OF THE APES” IS BASED ON IRAN AND IN GENERAL THE MUSLIM WORLD. I SUGGEST ALL MUSLIMS WATCH IT A FEW TIMES AND RECOGNISE EACH OTHER IN IT . ALL THE MUSLIMS THAT EVER LIVED AND WILL LIVE HAVE BEEN PORTRAYED IN IT . LOOK PROPERLY MUSTAPHA …. DON’T SMILE …IT’S NOT FUNNY ABDULLAH…. AND SO IS THE MOVIE “OUTBREAK” ABOUT DEALING WITH MUSLIM-POX…LIKE SMALL-POX….ONLY WORSE. The muslim credo is to POPULATE TO DOMINATE AND LIVE FOREVER IN THE GUTTERS OF THE WORLD.
    The muslim credo is to POPULATE TO DOMINATE AND LIVE FOREVER IN THE GUTTERS OF THE WORLD.
    iran’s leaders aren’t in the 16th century.that would be toooo modern for them .their thinking is even more primitive than apes.this is not a joke.just because an ape knows how to catch a sword and place some cloth on his head does not make him human. to be human you have to qualify with pure thought.

  8. Posted by Michael on February 8, 2010

    well that last comment was a little harsh.
    however it does have its points.
    If history is correct, Iv read that Christians have never sot nor do they teach to conquer Islam, The same can not be said of the Muslim
    world.
    It is their stated goal to convert the world
    to Islam. And to kill those who do not wish to do so.
    I do not wish to do so.

    How about you? do you want to have Islam forced
    on you?

  9. Posted by jpires on March 17, 2010

    Iran is an oil producing country and makes investments in oil refineries, has to import refined fuels. Let’s see what will happen to this government, when the people begin to feel the lack of food and fuel.
    What can you expect from a country that only invests in arms? Reason is Israel, which has always seen a great danger not only for Israel and for all over the world and the U.S. and EU should not get in a chess game with Iran, because this game of “blufs” they are good. In memory of human history there are many similar events that led to a disaster of a war when they should have acted immediately to stop the problem from scratch, but the memory is weak. The West must be hoping that the problem will be resolved by themselves, with help from the opposition, or that there is a large earthquake in the areas of nuclear power to destroy - (also only occur where there is need and not their fault no) - not to be criticized by other countries. If there is an earthquake in Iran that is only in nuclear power plants and the homes of rulers, because the people do not need more grief.
    The U.S. did wrong not to sell Israel, pumps high penetrating power - 200 feet below ground - they had finished with the problem, and the later act is worse, because they already produce almost all kinds of weapons, planes ships, and missiles. Between the war of words will be stocked and increasing the arsenal of war and, increasingly supporting international terrorism.
    Who guarantees us that a fanatical leader like him, having a nuclear weapon, do not want to attack Israel? It was well seen that in the Islamic world was a “Hero”.

Post a Comment