Ahmadinejad’s mixed messages can’t hide his nuclear ambition

January 28, 2007 by Will

Ahamdinejad sends mixed messagesThe way things are going, international observers will soon need more than fluency in Farsi to understand Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s policies. One day he promises the U.S. and Israel “will soon come to the end of their lives”, and then he claims Iran is cooperating with IAEA inspectors after banning 38 of them from Iran. As Iran prepares to test a nuclear bomb with North Korean aid, though, Ahmadinejad’s game of self-contradiction has gone from confusing to a major threat to global stability.

London’s Telegraph newspaper reported last Wednesday that North Koreans have been helping Iran prepare to test a nuclear device so small it couldn’t be detected by international agencies. The two rogue dictators have helped each other achieve their nuclear goals before–in 2005, North Koreans visited Iran to build missile bunkers. This new collaboration is more worrisome, however, because it represents a closer union between two tyrants.

Previous United Nations reluctance to act against North Korea’s nuclear goals has only emboldened Ahmadenijad, according to the Telegraph:

The Iranians are reported to have been encouraged by the fact that no punitive action was taken against North Korea.

appeasement.gifThis demonstrates that in a globalized world, appeasement weakens security not just in a region but across the entire world. According to the Telegraph, Iran will be able to detonate a half-kiloton nuclear bomb underground within a year. The effects of even such a small explosion would be widespread. Iran’s influence over Iraq would increase, militant factions in Israeli would gain political capital, and neighboring states would aggressively pursue their own deterrent options.

The international community, especially the United Nations Security Council, needs to stop hoping someone else will deal with the problem of a nuclear collaboration between Iran and North Korea. The IAEA should be given some backbone, and the new sanctions against Iran should be aimed at Ahmadinejad’s regime, not the Iranian people. The pre-war sanctions against Iraq exposed the flaws in poorly-targeted sanctions. Additionally, North Korea’s Kim Jong Il should be punished if his aid to Ahmadinejad produces a bomb, even if it means he never gets an iPod again.

The only real solution to the problem, though, must come from the Iranian people. The North Korean people have been confused and beaten down by years of Juche militarism and propaganda. In Iran, there are still some civil liberties. There have been encouraging reports of increasing dissent within Iran. If the Iranian people change their government, or at least make a strong statement against nuclear escalation, no amount of dictatorial chicanery can build a nuclear arsenal.

Whatever happens, Ahmadinejad will continue to threaten other countries while claiming to be only interested in peace. Unfortunately, Ahmadinejad’s seemingly warring policy directives do not reflect a conflicted government. Rather, like some of history’s most dangerous dictators, he understands that the best way to sneak up on the world is with two steps forward and one step back.

  Email this | Digg this | Del.icio.us  

Comments

  1. Posted by Kleen1020 on January 29, 2007

    Interesting Analysis. This video complements this article:

  2. Posted by Ahmadinejad on January 29, 2007

    hahah, if iran has a nuclear program united nations have a problem with it ! where was UN when USA started there nuclear program and even dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima ?(don’t forget your history before pointing fingers) With this history the world should worry more about USA first as the country is so violent that it started two wars in 2006 & has to interfere in everyones affairs !

  3. Posted by Sanda on January 29, 2007

    Hey !! … I simply fail to understand one thing, WHY DO YOU GUYS THINK THAT YOU KNOW EVERYTHING? … Its such a pity the way simple hard working Americans are used for political motives. My question is … more than a thousand nuclear tests conducted by the U.S. — where was UN?. Japan Nuked, where was UN? (o yes! … it didn’t exist back then). War in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq. All led by the U.S. - Now if you’re trying to tell me that people who don’t have anything to eat will destroy WTC ? - hard to digest. Our government shoves dust in our eyes while they kill innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan just for political motives all done by the power savvy like Mr. Bush.
    Do you have any idea how much burden these wars have on our economy?. How many died in the WTC? how many died in these wars? - the numbers are incomparable!. Destroying 2 towers is one thing but wiping out whole towns with women and children is another and sadly our government did just that.
    My plea is PLEASE TRY TO THINK LIKE A HUMAN BEING before marketing your political agendas. O yes!, you have forgotten how to think like a human years ago, just after when you realized that since we the U.S. are the most powerful therefore it gives us the right to destroy others.

  4. Posted by John D Infidel on January 29, 2007

    Iran IS a sponsor of terrorism through organizations such as Hezbollah and its Revolutionary Guard. The ruling mullahs in Iran declared war on the United States back in 1979 when they took US Embassy personnel hostage for 444 days. We (the United States) cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. It is a matter of national security, everything else be damned.

  5. Posted by Zoran on January 31, 2007

    If the creators of this site want to campaign against Ahmadinejad, can they do without quoting Ahmadinejad out of context and get their facts right

    You say that Ahmadinejad has called for Israel and the U.S. to be “destroyed”. The quotes you have given don’t say that. He says they “will come to the end of their lives”. Every country will come to the end of their lives one day as it is foolish to think the world will last forever.

    You then mentioned about Iranian democracy. Are you aware Ahmadinejad was voted in to office by about 60 percent of his people? Those comments reminded me of a corrupt election in a place called the U.S.A where Bush rigged the elction in his favour and got into office despite his opponent gaining more votes.

    and this comment is hilarious,

    “Whatever happens, Ahmadinejad will continue to threaten other countries while claiming to be only interested in peace”.
    There are only two modern day countries that have threatened and attacked other countries while being “interested in peace”, and they are the U.S.A and Israel.

    Then you talk on about Ahmadinejad supporting Hezbollah. Lebabnon were attacked by Israel, not the other way round. Israel still illegally hold large numbers of Arab prisoners without trial, and this is what sparked the sad kidnapping of the two Israeli soldiers. But murdering hundreds of Lebanese civilians with cluster bombs amongst other weapons is no justification.

    Finally Nuclear weapons (not directly referred to obviously) are strictly classed as being against the Koran, and we know which two countries possess thousands of nuclear weapons between them and threaten and attack other countries in the 21st century.

    Just remember this, before being influenced by the propaganda that corporations such as Fox News churn out.

  6. Posted by Alexander on January 31, 2007

    Zoran: Glad to see someone coming to the defense of Ahmadinejad.

    If you are saying that the statement “will come to the end of their lives” is not an implication of destruction than I assume you agree that when Ahmadinejad calls for Israel to be wiped off the map, he is really only saying “must vanish from the page of time”? And that is a harmless statement, right? Give me a break!

    The Iranian elections were a duplicitous mockery of democracy that were more decorative than those normally held in a theocratic dictatorship solely for the purpose of convincing the West not to mess with the mullahs on the issue of democratization as well as telling the poles who has the real power. I am very sad to see that you can be so easily misled by the mullah regime’s propaganda. Nobody can deny the fact that Iran is only run by a certain mullahs who have never been elected. While men and women there still can’t enjoy a basic level of freedom, some people here turn around and defend this show of vote-for-one-of-my-selected-puppets as democracy. The huge majority of people know Ahmadinejad’s election was a sham and the regime would declare whatever winner they intend to declare. Of course, a hardline puppet would be useful to the clerics so measures were taken to ensure a hardliner victory - someone to remind the Iranian people how righteous and holy the clerics are. And I can’t understand why the people trusted the untruthful promises such as a general monthly salary for everyone?.

    How many Iranians will be thanking Ahmadinejad in a years time I wonder? With the backing of the hardline elite comes to the fore and to follow - more suppression of free thinking and individual rights, religious and social policing. We continue to see this enacted in Iran day after day. The revolution might have had a point many years back, but to return is causing long term catastrophe for the promise of Iran. Ahmadinejad wants Iran back into Medieval times, where they can continue to oppress the people and subjugate women. By the way, no female candidates were allowed to participate in elections.

    Iran and its people have lost the possibility to regain the position their beautiful country deserves on the international cultural and political scene. When the oil price falls Iran will be forced to reform - peacefully I hope. Thank goodness Jordan and Saudi Arabia recognize the threat and are beginning to force barrel prices down.

    I can guarantee you that once Ahmadinejad is ousted, this site will turn into StopTheMullahs.com.

  7. Posted by Jose C. on February 14, 2007

    After reading this artilce and comments it still seems to me everyone is right but wrong at the same time. As always Right & Wrong are all a matter of perception. Also as history has taught us history is told by the victor. Personally I believe that Iran nor North Korea should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons. Also that if it comes to push comes to shove we should push first if it means protecting our country.

    We know that there are schools thoughout the middle east that teach hatred toward the west and preach to kill all the infedels (non beleavers or non muslems). Not just in Iran. At the same time I know that it’s not all muslems either. Not all arabs are terrorists or hate the us.

    Isreal has also done their share of injustices also. The UN doesn’t have any real teeth to enforce an real sactions. Also at the end of the day everyone pretty much has their own interests at heart and are not thinking of the greater good.

    Iraq although they have violated numberous UN resolutions was not enough of a threat for us to go in the way we did. Espeacially lying to the american people about a connection between Iraq and 9/11.

    In theory some of what the writer of this article makes sense but can it done. Does the UN and US have will the will do so? What can we do to resolve these issues that the writer and the people making their comments in a peaceful manner.

Post a Comment