Ahmadinejad’s Iraq Visit: Strengthening the New Terrorist Nerve Centre

April 5, 2008 by pulkit

Ahmadinejad's Iraq Visit

Iran’s President Mahmud Ahmadinejad, to whose notoriety we have dedicated this site, visited Iraq last month as world leaders and scribes watched tentatively. The visit, a substantial step forward in burying the Iran-Iraq-war hatchet, was dissected thoroughly by analysts who concluded, almost unanimously, that Iran’s widening influence in Iraq is in anyone’s best interests. The Iranian Mullahs are consolidating their influence in Iraq so it can be leveraged at a later point in time.

In the future, Iran might hold the reigns of Iraqi foreign policy. But how? The uninitiated might wonder. Well, rocket scientists (pun intended), it is very simple: if the Iraqi Shiites are asked which country is their favorite other than, of course, Iraq? They will most definitely chant in spontaneous chorus, Iran - without even glancing at the atlas. And these Shiites happen to constitute the majority in Iraq besides running the new populist government there.

The Iraqi Shiites were oppressed under Saddam’s regime, which was made up of Sunni’s. Some of them rose up against the dictator’s atrocities and had to voluntarily go into exile to escape Saddam’s wrath. Their favored destination to serve their exiles was Iran, a Shiite-dominated country that also hated Saddam to the hilt like them. The U.S has been accusing the Mullah regime of fueling the sectarian violence in Iraq by arming and training the guerillas. But Iran had close ties with Iraqi rebel outfits long before the American invasion of Iraq.

There are reports of Iranian sleuths and Revolutionary Guards (elite corps) training the militias in Iraq, in fact, a few arrests have also been made in Iraq. Weapons pompously displaying their Iranian origin have also been recovered from the Iraqi guerillas.

Iran is virtually in charge of a pan-Middle Eastern terror chain. It has ties with nefarious terror groups like Hezbollah and it is more than a cheer leader to these outfits. It can unsettle the tranquility of not only Israel but the entire region including Arab nations that align themselves with the allies. It again takes no rocket science to figure out that the Middle East has endeared itself to the economic stability of the entire world as it supplies almost all the oil and, therefore, an unstable Middle East can make the world economy go belly-up. Iran can destabilize the entire region and bring the world economy down tumbling.

What if all these guerilla outfits, that have tens of thousands fanatic fighters each, decide to go on a pan-Arab guerilla rampage – slaughter, pillage and set oilfields ablaze? This is what they can resort to given a frenzied go-ahead from Iran, which is the world’s newest terror nerve center.

Ahmadinejad’s Mullah Regime is pulling out all the stops in taking Iraq in its clutches. Ahmadinejad extended a $1 billion dollar loan offer to the Iraqi government during his “historic” visit. Iran plans to setup banks in Iraq, they have already reached an agreement over linking their electricity grids, and gas pipelines between the two are in the works. This will entwine Iraq’s economy to that of Iran’s virtually reducing it to a vassal state. It is also feared that Iran might launch a theological invasion of Iraq that will lead to radicalization of the Iraqi government. More of fanaticism, more of mayhem.

Iran can only gain from a sectarian cleft in Iraq as that will keep the allies engaged there giving it enough time to fructify its heinous goals. I fear that Iranian involvement in Iraq might perpetuate the violence there. This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan where Pakistani influence wrecked the country. It has to be remembered that amid all this senseless rage the ones that loose their lives are perfectly normal human beings like you and me.

  Email this | Digg this | Del.icio.us  

Comments

  1. Posted by momo on May 3, 2008

    borring! Always the same. Cant hear it anymore. Propaganda only!!! When talking about human rights, nuclear programs and national political agendas people should also have a short look to Israel and afterwards people should build their opinion about certain issues. Dont go blind through the world!

    best regards

  2. Posted by Fred on July 11, 2008

    100% right momo. It is very natural that Iran has ties to Shiites in Iraq. It would be surprising if they don’t. And violence is brought to Iraq, by invading it in the first place. Before it was country ruled by a cruel dictator, torn by sanctions, yet with little, or no violence. There are so many dictatorships around the world that U.S. administration quite happily support, and Sadam’s was one of those once upon a time. So, stop worry about violence in Iraq - just pull all troops or set the date for withdrawal as Iraq’s president recently requested - and violence would go down.

  3. Posted by P.Mijhar on July 17, 2008

    All is true that US government should withdraw it’s troop from Iraq to stop violence in the Persian Gulf region and find other way to discuss the crisis. Arab worlds didnot tolerate any foreign troops on their land, as some of these soldiers will not respect their religion or sentiments and violates their Islamic rules which create more trouble than securing people of these country. Does American people tolerate foreign troops to occupy their land too? What will be the response then Hell Freezes over?

Post a Comment